Thursday, November 27, 2014

"Hip Hop Women Shredding the Veil: Race and Class in Popular Feminist Identity"

Justina Farfan
WGST 202
Professor Currans
Blog Topic: Women and Hip Hop
Article Review #2
Morgan, Marcyliena. "Hip Hop Women Shredding the Veil: Race and Class in Popular Feminist               Identity." South Atlantic Quarterly 104.3 (2005): 425-44.

          In Marcyliena Morgan’s "Hip Hop Women Shredding the Veil: Race and Class in Popular Feminist Identity", she explores how the intersections of race, gender, and sexuality in hip hop are articulated through female rappers and artists. She explores these themes by analyzing the history of African American struggles in a white supremacist society, but more specifically the struggles of African American women. Women already were struggling for rights and equality, but it was more of a hardship for African American women. The way that women were able to speak out in a male dominated society was through hip hop. They communicated the hardships, struggles, and desire for equality through lyrical skill and rhyme, through hip hop.
         Morgan analyzed the history of African Americans starting in the 1950s when segregation was widely accepted throughout America. Back then, there was not just an issue with racial equality, “African American communities lived behind a veil that hid the complex and personal struggle to define manhood and womanhood” within a society that does not allow “social, cultural, and moral citizenship” (425). This was more difficult for African American women who heard different “messages about what it means to be a woman and what it means to be black in relation to man” (425). African American women were struggling for equality, but it was more difficult because they had to deal with racism and sexism at the same time.
          Morgan supports her claim that black women had a more difficult time in attaining equality by using historical references. In an 1855 case State of Missouri v. Celia, a black woman named Celia had attacked and killed her master after he had raped her. Unfortunately, the ruled in favor of the State of Missouri because Celia was a slave (429). This case set the precedent that since she was a slave she was not a woman (429). Later on after slavery was abolished, because “black women worked to support their families, unlike many white women, their claims to womanhood were treated as dubious” (429). Also since segregation was regularly practiced, the “control and surveillance were relentless and occurred within all aspects of black life, especially in terms of day-to-day interactions” (429). The way white people interacted with African Americans was “childlike” and degrading, more so to African American females. White women were seen as ‘‘people pleasers, concerned with harmony and with being accepted in life and in conversation” while black women were stereotypically seen as “dominant, subversive, emasculating, uncaring [and] loud-talking”. Hip hop women chose “a discourse style that is not only independent of patriarchal censorship and control, but also freely critiques the loss of power and responsibility of a good woman” (429”
          Hip hop women used their voices to challenge racial, gender, and class injustice, but it was very difficult for them to get the word out. For example, Morgan gives an account of when Sarah Jones’s recording “Your Revolution” was aired on the radio station KBOO-FM in 1999 in Portland, Oregon. This song was meant to retaliate against the misogyny presented in male’s lyrics and videos, however the song was met by retaliation. The FCC fined the station because it was viewed as “a feminist attack on male attempts to equate political revolution with
promiscuous sex and as such, is not indecent” (432). Morgan points out that their main issue with this song was that it was a female “hip-hop artist who defended herself in male terms” (432). Essentially the FCC was preventing women from speaking their minds, but still expected women to defend themselves against the misogyny in male hip hop artists music. The intersections of race, gender, and sexuality are “common for women in hip-hop culture” (433). Many would argue that women are dancing and listening to these songs that exemplify misogyny, yet “hip-hop artists both dance and protest as cultural participants and innovators” using their skills and “constantly [embodying] and [reframing] feminist identity” (433).
          Morgan states that “hip-hop women practice and perform desire” (440). They are really just exemplifying the desire to be treated with respect, the desire for change, and especially the desire “for a feminist ideology that includes all women and privileges none” (440). Desire is very powerful and is something that everyone can relate to; “desire shreds the veil” (440). This veil hides the injustices and stereotypes against women. Hip-hop women “consistently explore feminism, the intersections of race and class, and gender marginalization and oppression” (441). While at the same time, they support African American men, all men and those who have been “targeted by the state” (441). Morgan states that successful MC’s are making connections with everyone, addressing the struggles that have pervaded African Americans since they arrived in America and the struggles of being a woman in a male dominated society. They encourage and inspire and strive to make change.

          This article looks at how hip hop women “shred the veil of racism, sexism, and classism within African American communities and American’s in general” (426). In contrast, Margaret Hunter and Kathleen Soto’s article “Women of Color in Hip Hop: the Pornographic Gaze” depicts women as accepting of misogyny widely represented in hip-hop music. Hunter and Soto explain that the ways women are accepting is through female artists being overly sexual in their lyrics and by blatantly accepting misogynistic themes such as the “ride or die” type of woman, where she is “valorized” for putting her life in danger at the expense of her significant other. Morgan explores deeper into the history of women and hip-hop culture. She explains that women are supporting their relationship to men either in friendship or marriage which identifies “race and class hypocrisy” and that women hip-hop artists sometimes purposely make their lyrics extremely sexual because they are spoken in “male terms”. They use the overly explicit and sexual language to not degrade themselves, but to show an example of how men will speak about women. Women of hip-hop are interacting within hip-hop culture and challenging the common stereotypes posed against women and race. They constantly explore these intersections of race, gender, and sexuality, hoping to bring change to prevalent ways of thinking.

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

Sexual Violence Against Men in Armed Conflict

The National Crime and Victimization Survey asked a sample of 40k different households throughout America and found that 38% of the victims of rape and sexual violence were against men. Due to the past idea that men not victims and that they were almost always perpetrators, the leader of this investigation decided to check if this was an error somewhere as the results were greatly different that the previous 5-14 percent of victims.

They couldn't really find anything that could explain why this increase happened, but it would be probable that the publicity surrounding the scandal at Penn State's head football coach sparking attention in victim's lives.

It later goes on to explain that since men usually have penises that are "made to penetrate," they will be the perpetrator. The article explains that they found about 46% of male victims to have been attacked by female aggressors.

More details can be found at:
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/04/male_rape_in_america_a_new_study_reveals_that_men_are_sexually_assaulted.html
-Elijah Zagorski

Changes in Women Country Artists


Country music has changed quite a bit throughout the years. While some things may have changed for the worse, other things have changed for the better. Women country artists have changed the ways they express and present themselves dealing with gender roles and stereotypes. In 1986, Tammy Wynette released her single titled “Stand by Your Man”. The song was a number one hit for three weeks. In the song she talks about a husband who does things that the women does not understand and has good times while the wife deals with bad times. Her excuse for his wrong behavior is that “after all he’s just a man” therefore the woman must “stand by your man”. Wynette’s song has since drawn fire from feminists viewing it as non-liberating and even Hilary Clinton once voiced her opinion on the song when she claimed in an interview that she would not stand by her man like Tammy Wynette. Today, however, there are songs like Miranda Lambert’s “Gunpowder and Lead” and Carrie Underwood’s “Before HeCheats” and “Two Black Cadillacs” that are far from “standing by your man”. Lambert sings about going home and loading her shotgun in response to an abusive husband. Underwood sings about destroying her cheating boyfriends car and two womens' plot against a two-timer. There are many more songs out today that are much like these songs and could be considered as liberating for female artists in breaking away from the stereotype created years and years ago that women “stand by your man” no matter what.
- Ashley Compton

Transgender Representation in Pop Culture

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/06/06/laverne-cox-and-the-state-of-trans-representation-in-pop-culture

I wanted to not just address gender inequality and discrimination in films, but as well the representation (or lack thereof) of other genders, mainly those that fall under the trans umbrella. The representation is underwhelming, but I also believe that it is beginning to slowly rise.

Hopefully, it will rise quicker and one day, there will not only be representation of positive transgendered people, or people who are under that umbrella, in films but in daily life as well. Currently, I would say Laverne Cox is quickly becoming prominent and that's very important. From the article, "A GLAAD study found that in the last 10 years, more than half of trans characters depicted on television were portrayed in a negative light, and even more were problematic in some sense."

When I searched for an article or something to post this time, I wanted to focus on transgendered representation, but it was unsurprisingly difficult to find much that looked good. And many of the articles had to do with how they are villainized in media. The article is a bit long but I think it does talk and explain well about this issue. As they say in the article too, although I will not quoting directly, it is also very important that a transgendered person be played by, yes, a transgendered person. Representation on screen is one thing, representation behind the stage is even more important. 

- Amanda 

Arguments Over Women's Prisons

I came across a somewhat overzealous article about closing down all women's prisons. It's a question that's been bouncing around the House of Lords in Britain, but O'Brien talks about bringing the idea to America. Although I do not think that's the answer, I felt for her a bit more when I read a counter article.

Instead of taking her ideas seriously, Owens attacked her, even going so far as to demean the college she teaches at. Sadly, I disagree with O'Brien, but Owens handled this in the completely wrong way. His job was to counter her idea, but he made it unprofessional and entirely about the author instead of the idea.

Here are the two articles to read:
O'Brien
Owens

What do you think of them?
-Erin Lucas

 

The movie GBF is about a high school boy named Tanner who is outed when the school's GSA is searching for the latest fashion craze, a gay best friend. Pretty soon, Tanner is pulled in 3 different directions by the school's 3 main clique leaders.

This movie addresses the stereotype of gay boys being a social accessory, which essentially is objectification. The 3 clique leaders essentially use him as a chess piece, trying to gain dominance over the other two cliques. Tanner pretty much reluctantly plays along with it until the end, where he addresses that he's not an accessory.

In real life, I highly doubt that a GBF is such an important factor in someone's popularity, but I still think that gay boys, and I'm sure even some gay girls have experienced being objectified as an accessory.

When I came out to my friends in high school, some of them joked about having a gay best friend, and it wasn't entirely false; I was gay, and I was very close with them. They never boasted around about it, and for the most part they treated me as a person rather than a thing to improve their social standing, so I wasn't really objectified, but the title still kind of irked me.

In my opinion, I think this objectification can be a kind of false acceptance, it's like, "Oh I don't care that you're gay, that's totally cool, but I'm going to stereotype you and treat you like I would treat my clothes or handbag." It's still a type of oppression, and I'm glad this movie addresses this because it shows people that this isn't a good thing, and that people should be treated like people and not handbags.

-Casey Coulter

On Being a Gay Black Man

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/terrence-chappell/why-im-a-black-man-before-im-a-gay-man_b_6070912.html

Click on this link to read the article, "Why I'm a Black Man Before I'm a Gay Man" written by Terrence Chappell.

I thought this article was really cool because it combines and addresses a topic we haven't talked about too much in class: a single person identifying with both a minority race and minority sexual orientation.

My favorite passage from the article is when Chappell bluntly and powerfully explains how his identity as a Black man outdoes his identity as a gay man:

"There's a certain type of painstakingly sharp and "always on" relentless awareness you just have to have as a black man in all spaces... At any point and in any space, I can choose not to disclose my sexuality, and thus be perceived as "straight." My sexuality isn't integrated into the rest of my life unless I allow it to be... People don't cross the street to avoid that scary gay man walking toward them."

-Bridget Thomas


Monday, November 10, 2014

Michelle Dumaresq




Michelle Dumaresq is a transwoman from Canada who competes in downhill cycling races. Because of the fact that she was born a male, she has faced a great deal of strife and resistance from other competitors in the cycling races, as well as from sport organizations themselves. Fellow competitors were initially accepting of her, and even encouraged her to compete, until she started beating them in the mountain bike races. At one point in time, Dumaresq's racing license was suspended for awhile due to her transsexual history, but eventually her license was reissued to her once it was proven that her legal birth certificate recognized her as female.
Despite the negativity that Dumaresq was faced with, she has led a very successful competitive career as a downhill mountain bike cyclist.
The article that I found about her story was originally publishes in April of 2004, and in the interview Dumaresq stated that she had not really intended to be the poster child for transgender athletes and that she "didn't ask for all this attention" and that she "just wanted to race a bicycle." However, she also went on to state that she held the hope that "in ten years' time, no one will give a shit. Somebody had to come forward. It just happened to be me."
I found Dumaresq's statement about hoping that attitudes towards transgender athletes would be different in ten years to be significant because of the fact that it is now ten years since the interview, and unfortunately, attitudes about the inclusion of transgender athletes seem relatively unchanged. 

For more information about Michelle Dumaresq, check out the following links:
http://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/biking/mountain-biking/Michelle-Raises-Hell.html  

Watch the documentary film about Dumaresq's life here:

--Melissa Condon

Sexuality and Visual Art: Georgia O'Keeffe's Flowers

This time, the subject matter in the paintings that I am going to share with you does not seem like it would be the slightest bit sexual. Check it out, flowers.

"Calla Lily Turned Away", 1923
This piece was painted by Georgia O'Keeffe. O'Keeffe is considered the "Mother of American Modernism". She was born in 1887 in Wisconsin, and was publicly recognized as an artist in 1916 by the New York art community, and continued to sustain popularity until she passed away in 1986. She liked to paint landscapes (which very often specifically included skulls, she was fascinated by skulls) and close ups of flowers. She liked to play around with shape, color, and lighting.

O'Keeffe's works are especially appealing in an abstract kind of way. In fact, many believe that her flowers are extremely sexual. O'Keeffe was known to experiment with patterns, sizes, and detail. And so, she purposely would make some parts of a subject larger or smaller. It is claimed that she changed up the sizes of certain parts of her flowers in order to portray female sexuality. Some claim that her flowers are erotic. This painting, specifically, is claimed to be sexual/erotic.
"White and Blue Flower Shapes", 1919
Do we see the possible resemblance? People commonly look at this piece and see female genitalia. Anyhow, in response to critics who believed that her flowers were abstract expressions of her sexuality (FYI, some critics went as far to claim she was a lesbian), O’Keeffe said, "Well – I made you take time to look at what I saw and when you took time to really notice my flowers you hung all your own associations with flowers on my flower and you write about my flower as if I think and see what you think and see of the flower – and I don’t.” (In Ernest W. Watson, “Georgia O’Keeffe,” American Artist [June 1943]:10.)
Red Canna
"Red Canna"
Flower of Life II
"Flower of Life II"
I think it's fair to say that her flowers are very sensual. But what do you guys think? Do you find these pieces as sexual, or not sexual?

If you'd like to see more of or learn more about her work, you can go here.

-Josephine Hicks

"Cock Rock"

http://www.revolvermag.com/blogs/final-six-the-six-best-cock-rockchick-rock-songs.html

This article highlights a few songs that this author considers his favorite "cock rock", and chick rock songs.  "Cock rock" is a term used to describe rock and roll where the men in the band are extremely sexual, and show themselves off.  The music sings about women mainly, and is very oppressive.  "Cock rock" was prevalent in the 80's with metal hair bands, but is still in existence today.  The author picks some songs that are very degrading to women, and the fact there is a term called "cock rock" is a disgrace to the genre, and puts a bad image on rock and roll in general.  Men oversexualize themselves in "cock rock", and somehow these bands have been some of the most popular rock and roll bands of all time.  Also, the author's vocabulary and tone in his article is ridiculous, and shows a lot about his lack of character.

Anthony Bellore

Violence Against Transgender People

http://www.toledoblade.com/Police-Fire/2014/11/07/Transgender-woman-in-hospital-after-brutal-attack.html

About a week ago in Toledo, Candice Rose Milligan was assaulted in the street.  Ms. Milligan is a 33 year old transgender woman who was found bleeding from the mouth with a large bump on her forehead after being  punched and beaten by three men who had been shouting derogatory remarks at her.

This event has lead to a slightly stronger push for a revision of hate crime laws:
“Assaults like this go very underreported if not unreported,” Mr. Crafts said. “We know there’s stuff like this going on all the time. Victims are afraid to report because they’re not sure what type of response they’ll receive.”Thursday afternoon, the National LGBTQ Task Force Action Fund announced, in the response to the attack on Ms. Milligan, the need for statewide nondiscrimination protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer people.
Currently, Sergeant Heffernan has said “This doesn’t fit in the definition of [a race, religion, or ethnic intimidation enhancement] exactly because, if it’s anything, it may have been done because of his sexual orientation, but we haven’t proven that either.” 
On Thursday, Candice was released from the Mercy St. Vincent Medical Center after undergoing two surgeries and having her jaw wired shut due to a broken mandible.  

Nicki Minaj: Looking Beyond the "Big Booty"


I'm pretty sure that almost everyone knows who this is and have seen her new "Anaconda" video. It's the one and only,Nicki Minaj, the hip hop and pop artist, iconic for her ample behind. Her new single "Anaconda" has raised a lot of attention and criticism towards her. It seems that there are two main reactions to her music video either amazed or in pure disgust. Why has her video caused such an outrage? Is it because she uses her body to sell her song? To make money? Is it just such a sexual video that it makes you uncomfortable? Whatever the reason may be, perhaps we can take a deeper look into the video.

According to Bitch: A Feminist Response to Pop Culture, Nicki Minaj is praised for her video. This is because she is owning her sexuality and she is addressing the way black woman have been portrayed in the media. There is a double standard between black and white women. This double standard was also pointed out by Sir Mix A Lot in his song "Baby Got Back" which was once highly controversial, but is now considered "tame and comical" (not to mention its where "Anaconda" came from). Although "Baby Got Back" objectified women, it pointed out a "body style outside of mainstream standards of beauty that was desirable". Minaj is doing the same and acknowledged this herself in response to the criticism by captioning a Sports Illustrated cover of three topless women as "acceptable" and then captioned her "Anaconda" cover as "unacceptable". 

An article by the Huffington Post, asks you to take a second look at her video. This articles looks at the dynamics of the video especially the part where she gives Drake a lap dance. It seems that he is seen objectifying her and shes pleasing him with the lap dance. However before he tries to touch her she walks away taking control. In another way saying she's not going to be objectified anymore. After reading these articles, go ahead an click on the video link again. Does it change your views or no?

-Justina Farfan 

Offside; Iranian Women Go Public

 
           It is so true that sporting events are so much better when you are watching them live. Because I live in semi-close proximity to Detroit, I am able to attend Red Wings Games as often as I please. When standing in line to get into the Joe Louis Arena, I have never given thought to the idea that I may not be allowed in because I am a girl. After hearing about what Iranian women have to go through to see their favorite sports teams, I realized how much being blocked from entering a game would hurt. Sporting events in general have a way of unifying fans as a whole; especially when it is a really important game. Iran experienced a massive surge of excitement when they were entered in the FIFA World Cup in 1998. This was a time of political darkness for the Iranian population and the world cup was seen as sort of a silver lining. It was finally a positive event that was happening in Iran. This occasion was no different than any other in regards to the laws against women attending sporting events therefore they were left out. To watch your country come back to life while you cannot be a part of it would be devastating! 
         This animation not only shows the Iranian women's desire to attend football games to support their team, but also that they cannot attend just like the village dogs. It is almost dehumanizing to them. These women have the same desire as any other Iranian football fan, but they will watch the excitement from the outside gates. As time proceeded some women took a stand and helped make a movie called Offside. In this movie, Iranian women sneak into a football game wearing men's clothes and covering their hair and faces and are arrested one by one for their offenses.

-Sarah Jump

Sunday, November 9, 2014

The Women Against Feminism Movement

 The Today Show's segment on anti-feminist women.
In this video, co-anchor Savannah Guthrie joins Soledad O'brien, the CEO of Starfish Media Group, and Abby Huntsman, a co-host on MSNBC's The Cycle, in talking about the growing counter-movement 'Women Against Feminism'. They show why women, especially young women, are against the feminist movement and their own thoughts on the matter.
Keep in mind that their arguments are one sided (pro-feminism), but imagine what it would have been like if one of them was anti-feminism and to have them share their arguments as well, if one side should convince the other...

- Tarryn

The Pixel Project Selection 2011

      The Pixel Project is a nonprofit organization "whose mission is to raise awareness, funds, and volunteer power for the cause to end violence against women using social media, online strategies, and new technologies" (Pixel Project). The Pixel Project created a 16 for 16 campaign. This campaign looks at 16 films, documentaries, and TV documentaries that look at issues of sexual violence against women. While about 4 of the films look at forms of violence that are different than sexual violence, the rest do look at sexual violence. The forms of sexual violence can range from things such as spousal abuse in Fried Green Tomatoes and What's Love Got To Do With It to rape in UMOJA-No Men Allowed and Sex Crimes Unit. I think that looking at movies and documentaries is a good way to see sexual violence situations in ways the people can relate to. To see the full list of films, documentaries, and TV documentaries that made the list and their trailers click here.
Volunteer with Us

I've attached the link for the Pixel Project's home page in case you're interested in learning more about the pixel project or donating to their cause.
                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                              -Ali Marnon

Thursday, November 6, 2014

Amanda Blohm
Professor Currans
Blog Topic: Gender and Popular Films
Article Review #1
Smith, Stacy L., et al. "Assessing Gender-Related Portrayals in Top-Grossing G-Rated Films." Sex Roles 62.11-12 (2010): 774-86. ProQuest. Web. 4 Oct. 2014.
            In “Assessing Gender-Related Portrayals in Top-Grossing G-Rated Films”, Stacy Smith, et al discuss the portrayal of genders, specifically the gender binary, stereotypes in G-Rated films and how they affect children. Smith et al address the fact that in several studies the percentage of men represented in G-rated films is much higher than the percentage of women. Not only this, they discuss how these representations of men and women, through stereotypes and other traits, impact the developing child and their beliefs concerning gender and gender roles. The last line of the article may be in itself the main point, as they say “that viewing stereotypes may have serious consequences for children’s information processing of and schema development for gender” (784).
            The first argument they make has to do with the fact that the representation of men to women is skewed badly in the direction of men. To an older viewer, there is a high difference between the amount of men represented compared to women. However, for a child, their only influence in this sort of representation may be G-rated films and they have no idea that there may be anything wrong with the amount of women in a film versus the amount of men. Stacy smith et al go on to say, “Exposure to such distorted “reel” world images may be having detrimental effects on youth’s gender-role socialization” (774). After all, when it is the only images they are receiving, and when children are at such an age they are still developing ideas about the world around them, this becomes dangerous to how they view gender-roles. It should not be surprising then, that one study referred to reported after bringing a television into a Canadian town that “females had become significantly more gendered in terms of their relationships with peers and authority figures whereas males increased their stereotypical attitudes toward a variety of behaviors and occupations” (775). Exposure to media like this, especially since this sometimes is the only type parents are willing to show their children, “has suggested that stereotypical messages found on television can have a negative impact on young viewers’ developing beliefs about gender” (775). However, it is extremely difficult to consider only how G-rated films affect children as they are still likely to watch other rated films than the general audience. But Smith et al. pursues this, by looking into how women and men are represented.
            Generally speaking, in terms of the ratio of men to women in G-rated film, one could well assume that it is not an equal scale. Through their studies, Smith et al. have come to find that “the ratio of males to females was 2.75 to 1” (776). By approximation, this means that a child would see 2.75 men on screen that they would for one woman. To make matters worse, they behaviors of males and females are also poorly represented. It also emerges that, when the studies were taken, gender roles and stereotypes were heavily predominant in G-rated films. Beyond looking into the amount of gender representation and other traits, they also looked into whether or not there was a difference over the years, considering all the data they had complied for the sets of years. Though they did a fifteen-year span, it could come up that a “total of 71.8% of characters were male and 28.2% were female, independent of when a G-rated movie was distributed over the last 15 years” (783). But if we actually go in a span of separated years, the “distribution of gender by epoch was as follows: 1990–94=69.9% males (n=496), 30.1% females (n=214); 1995–99=74.2% males (n=815), 25.8% females (n=283); 2000–2004=70.6% males (n=674), 29.4% females (n=281)” (783). Unsurprisingly, the children of 1995-1999, those that are currently younger adults, would most definitely be experiencing the most unfair representation of gender. We are seeing better numbers in the recent years, but it is not all that good for a child’s development.
            Interestingly, despite the focus on how women are represented unfairly in G-rated films, they were not the only focus. As Smith et al. says, “Notably, almost a fifth of the working women in the sample held counterstereotypical jobs. On the other hand, only a small fraction of the working men (2.3%) held traditionally feminine occupations” (784), which suggests more about the gender inequality than we think of. Of course, a young boy seeing masculine men on the big screen who save the day and in general have the most representation, may seem like it is good but it does not sit well. Any child needs good, strong representation and films telling boys that they cannot be in a ‘feminine’ career or in general that they cannot look up to females creates more gender roles that are harmful. This “underrepresentation of females on screen can negatively impact both developing males and females. For girls, a lack of representation may affect their perceptions of importance or self-esteem. For boys, exposure may subtly perpetuate the status quo and reinforce a hegemonic view of girls and women” (783). Rather, it is not that men are unfairly represented in numbers, but that their stereotypes can be just as harmful as the female stereotypes. Moreover, they are as affected as young girls are when it comes to how they view women on screen. Both representations of men and women perpetuate gender roles through the child’s mind, whether they are female or male.

            This article focuses intently on the inequality of genders in popular G-rated films, which relates extremely closely to my topic of gender and popular films. Smith et al. talk about how representation and stereotypes affect not only society but how a child develops their perceptions of gender and gender-roles. I find this similar to Celia Ridgeway’s “How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World”, as they both do refer to the rate of which men and women differ in fields. However, Ridgeway definitely focuses more on describing the generalized gender inequality issue where Smith et al. talk specifically about gender inequality in films, but they do both address how it is influencing society to continue using this inequality. Much of this information I was aware of, not the exact statistics but knowing that there was most definitely an unfair representation of women when compared to men. I would have liked, however, to see even more breaking of gender roles and pointing out that girls and boys do not have to look up to characters that are their gender. A girl could look up and aspire to be like a male character, just as a boy could do the same with a female character. 

Equality Michigan- Exploring Organizations Involved in Advocating for Trans-Rights

   Equality Michigan is an organization founded in 2010 with the merging of two progressive organizations: The Triangle Foundation and Michigan Equality. This is a local organization that advocates for a variety of social justice issues, including being anti- violence toward the LGBT community or the HIV- Positive community, for marriage equality for homosexual individuals, for changes in health care coverage for domestic partners, and acceptance of every individual who identifies as part of the LGBT community or who is HIV positive. They even advocate for changes in immigration laws that would allow trans-individuals in other even more prejudicial countries to see asylum in the United States. Overall, I think this is a really cool organization because of the variety of issues that it tackles. It really does a good job of combining the transgender movement with other social justice movements to create a multi-issue movement that advocates for all sorts of people. Although it may not be perfect in how it receives its funding or on some of its focuses, I believe that this organization represents a positive step forward for the transgender rights movement and other civil rights movement.

Here's their website where you can learn more!

- Sarah Reasoner

Violence Against Transgender People: First Article Review

Article Review #1
Alex Duncan
WGST 202h
Tues/Thurs 12:30-1:45
Dr. Currans
Blog Topic: Violence against Transgender People
Article Review #1

Stotzer, Rebecca L. "Violence against Transgender People: A Review of United States Data." Aggression and Violent Behavior 14.3 (2009): 170-79. Web
            The article “Violence against Transgender People: A Review of United States Data” by Rebecca L. Stotzer addresses the issues of viewing gender and sex as a binary with no deviation and no variation.  This article looks at data regarding violence, discrimination, and abuse of transgender individuals.  There are six sections to this article and the data focuses on sexual violence, physical violence, verbal abuse/harassment and other non-physical violences, as well as hotline calls, social service reports, and police reports.  The data shows the high risks of violence that transgender individuals face throughout their lives due to perceived gender nonconformity.
            The part of this article titled Section 2 talks about sexual violence. It also includes a table (Table 1) which documents self-report surveys from transgender people and the amount of abuse they have encountered.  The author uses these studies to delve into motives and results.  Of 248 participants being questioned, 43% stated that they were a victim of homophobia and 35% stated that they were a victim of transphobia (2.1.1).  It was found that FTM transgender individuals seem to more frequently experience sexual violence than MTF transgender individuals.  However, both numbers are far higher than the average cisgender individual.  Within this section we commonly see shockingly high statistics, which are used to reiterate the constant danger. This includes a focus on transgender sex workers, 35% of whom report being raped since entering prostitution (2.1.2).  Other than the fact that this article doesn’t differentiate between sexual violence and rape, the rest of it is very thorough and includes a lot of tables.
            Violence in the home often includes not only sexual abuse, but also domestic violence of both a physical and/or verbal nature.  When asked about whether or not one experienced physical abuse in the home, 67.3% of MTFs answered yes as opposed to 38.7% of FTMs (2.2.3). These results are quite different from the statistics regarding sexual violence seen in the previous section.  Interviews also show that a high amount of gender nonconforming people feel that they are unsafe when in public spaces due to the fact that they are transgender  and that FTM individuals were significantly more likely to feel unsafe (2.2.4).  The separation that the author puts between MTF and FTM transgender individuals has the potential to bring light to underlying misogynistic thought patterns in addition to homophobia and transphobia. 
            Sections 3 and 4 address hotline calls, social service reports, and police reports.  The Gender Public Advocacy Coalition reports that 51 gender nonconforming individuals under the age of thirty were murdered in the United States between 1995 and 2005 (3.2).  91% of these were people of color, most of whom were poor and lived in a big city, and 92% were biologically male with some form of feminine presentation (3.2). These statistics can also show racist and classist actions among perpetrators of crime and how those factors play into violence along with gender identity and expression.  Stotzer states that identifying the nature and extent of the violence is the first step in understanding the effect that violence has in the lives of transgender people.  She concludes that transgender people are highly at risk, and that self-report surveys indicate that most trans individuals are likely to experience at least one of the three main types of violence discussed in their lifetime.  She acknowledges some flaws in the methods of data collecting, but has the statistical evidence (such as significance tests) which show that it is highly likely that most of the data is accurate. 

            Even though this article refers to the term “transgender” as meaning any gender nonconforming individual, it still separates many of the statistics by MTF and FTM identifications.  This puts some focus on viewing biological sex as a binary concept and treats it as a necessary point of identification in the stories of transpeople.  This contrasts with many of the in-class readings which do not put quite as much focus on the biological sex of an individual, and rather focuses on gender roles or perception.  In the case of the interview with Judith Butler, it was about gender being performative.  People responded to actions before discussing biology.  However, her points regarding tomboys and “sissy boys” do tend towards the idea of assigned gender, but they don’t explore all aspects of nonconformity as much.  This separation, however, at least causes me to think more upon what someone’s misled motives may be when committing a hate crime, and knowing motives is one of the steps to preventing attacks.  

Review of "The Relationship between Masculinity and Sexual Prejudice in Factors Associated with Violence Against Gay Men” by Rebecca Stotzer

Stotzer, Rebecca L., and Margaret Shih. "The Relationship between Masculinity and Sexual Prejudice in Factors Associated with Violence Against Gay Men." Psychology of Men & Masculinity 13.2 (2012): 136-42. ProQuest. Web. 7 Oct. 2014.
            In “The Relationship between Masculinity and Sexual Prejudice in Factors Associated with Violence Against Gay Men,” Rebecca Stotzer and Margaret Shih explore the relationship between expression of masculinity, sexuality, perceived sexuality, and prejudice. They do this with an experiment involving 60 heterosexual-identifying men pulled from a pool of around 1.5k undergraduates in a large Midwestern university. The ages of participants was 18-22, with a majority of the population being white. They made it so the men who participated were only heterosexual – as opposed to being men that identify as mostly heterosexual, mostly homosexual, or only homosexual. Their design was to place them in a high or low sexual prejudice score and then in a setting that’s threatening or not. For example, in order to create a threat, they told “[p]articipants in the threat condition… that their score on a test was more typical of a women’s score” (138).
            The authors identify that there is a “correlate[ion] with hostile sexism” and homophobia (136). Based on previous studies, the authors state that there is bias based on their population: college-aged men tended to be perpetrators of violence against homosexual men and that younger men tended to be more frequent perpetrators than older men. Because of this and those participating in the study, this sample doesn’t represent the entirety of men that commit violent acts against gay men. Keeping this in mind, what they did find was that it seemed that tolerant and intolerant men will have different ways of dealing with a threat to their masculinity. While those that are intolerant will appear to need anger or forcefulness to handle the threat, tolerant men will be able to have their own way to manage the threat in a way that denies or stops it. In other words, men that are tolerant to homosexuality had different reactions to threats against their masculinity than men who were homophobic. This applies when they are confronted with a threat from anyone: another man, a woman, or someone else. The homophobic reaction is for “their own fears of failing to be masculine” or to regulate others to their idea of what a man should be (141).
            An important relationship that was uncovered by this was that: when the threat is lower, sexual prejudice was lower; which threat is higher, sexual prejudice was higher. A stance that can be taken on this is public safety due to the produced aggression: if intolerant men become aggressive due to a threat presented, gender non-conforming people, women, and homosexual men can all be at risk of violence. Through the study, men that were placed in what they used as their threatening environment had higher ratings of their own masculinity, correlating with a lowering of tolerance towards less masculine men. In contrast, men that were in a threat-free atmosphere had a significant difference in self-report of masculinity. These go hand-in-hand.
            This article explores the relationship between men, masculinity, and sexual violence against men. This relates to the class not only as it explores the binary ideal that men are masculine and are not going to be feminine, but also the heteronormative agenda that rejects any queer expressions. This article, like Judith Butler, supports the notion that gender is performative and that the expression and perception of it can affect life. This study explored the notion of the performative portion of gender being affected by the environment, as they compensate for what may make them feel insecure in their surroundings and allowing them to alter how they feel about others. Unlike Butler’s notions, the authors of this article seem to allow sexuality and gender expression to overlap and become nearly synonymous as they consider homosexual men to be threats against masculinity as there in an assumption that gay men have a more feminine expression. This is a part of my blog topic of sexual violence against men as it has a focus on homosexual men, with causes of violence against them.

-Elijah Zagorski

Trans Inclusion in the Feminist Movement Article Review 1

Tarryn Priestly
Oct. 6th, 2014
Prof. Currans
Blog Topic: The Feminist Movement
Article Review #1

Eli R. Green (2006) “Debating Trans Inclusion in the Feminist Movement”, Journal of Lesbian
Studies, 10:1-2, 231-248
      In Eli Green's “Debating Trans Inclusion in the Feminist Movement”, Green goes through and describes the exclusion of trans people, mainly transwomen, within the feminist movement. He describes the reasons for such exclusion, discussing the sources for it and why it's still a relevant topic today. With the reasons, he creates a rebuttal for each of them, explaining why they're incorrect in their thinking. He then offers 'a trans-positive perspective': including trans individuals in feminist spaces and dismissing the controversy of their inclusion.
      Green starts off with two quotes, both illustrating the exclusion of trans people in feminist spaces, the first from Charlotte Cronson stating 'We as feminists owe it to ourselves...to deconstruct and oppose ...transpolitics. In a feminist analysis they are, to put it simply, on the wrong side. In opposition to feminism.' (page 232). He then goes to say that such an exclusion could in fact be due to ignorance on the information of trans people/politics, or the fear that trans-inclusion could 'potentially undermine feminist theory and ideology' (232). He soon explains that this roots from the beginnings of feminism, when women wore androgynous clothes because the feminine clothes they were once seen in was now considered oppressive. With this androgynous dress code, feminine transwomen that relied on feminine dress were then seen as 'traitors' as they did not oppose of traditional femininity with the other women. This 'refusal' of transwomen to dress in an androgynous manner added to the questioning of transwomen's legitimacy in feminism, along with them being originally assigned male at birth.
      The exclusion of transwomen in feminist spaces was then intensified when Janice Raymond had published The Transsexual Empire, a book supporting trans-exclusion and providing one of many voices in feminism for years as there was no other voice to counter its ideas at that time. Green dissects the main points and ideas presented in this book, providing the counter voice that had not been strong enough thirty years ago. He tells of the faults within the book's premise, including its transphobic idea that transsexuals are merely people 'born in the wrong body' and enforcing the rigidity of gender. This is faulty due to its misunderstanding of other people who don't fit the gender binary and get medical 'treatment' for other reasons than to be the opposite sex. This also shows its lack of understanding of how difficult it is in the first place to get medical 'treatment' for trans people. Green goes on refuting Raymond's statements with the fact that Raymond cannot 'oppose the construction of trans identities, when according to her social constructionist views of gender, the identity of “woman” is created in the same way' (236). Raymond's statements of how female-bodied feminists would not identify as men because they're feminists and others, such as transmen essentially don't exist (when in reality the facts she had used were biased), give Green reason enough to use examples from Judith Butler and other activists to support trans people, but also bring back the idea that feminism is based on intellect and reason, not biology.
      Another source Green looks at is the website QuestioningTransgender.org (one I believe doesn't exist anymore), a website that openly states in their mission statement how they exclude trans people and how others should exclude trans people in feminism as well, referring to the politics of trans-inclusion as trans-politics. Green, of course, disagrees with the website's descriptions by pointing out how the website lacks any research-related or factual evidence to support their arguments. He then disagrees with the website's claim that the oppressed should change the world themselves and place none of the blame on the oppressor, when the responsibility of an issue such as oppression can't be one-sided; both parties involved must take responsibility and action. In later arguments, Green shows how feminists can acknowledge the oppression of trans people, but many being privileged, won't see that they themselves are the oppressor, as they believe that the one group, men, are the only oppressors when it comes to the issue of feminism.
      Green confirms that gender-variant people have their identities challenged and scrutinised by feminists within the movement, having their identities claimed as alien to the movement and their problems then aren't seen as that big of a deal. Green does agree that feminism could shift its ideology and theory with the inclusion of trans people, but that poses such a threat to people that they'd rather protect the feminism they know than reach out to the oppressed trans people. However, there are organisations that are heading in the right direction of trans-inclusion, such as the GenderPAC (the Gender Public Advocacy Coalition), but it's still a long way before trans people are truly included in feminism without question.
      While there may still be feminists that believe in the exclusion of transpeople, it's not a stance that is looked upon too highly nowadays. Most feminists would agree that 'Anti-inclusion feminists are creating a no-win situation by condemning transpeople for both confirming and blurring the gender binary.' (241). The reason this article relates to my blog topic of the feminist movement is because it discusses the inherent problems that the movement has faced and still faces today. Feminists in the movement claim to be all against oppression of the female sex, but turn around and oppress those that don't conform to the social norms of gender or sex, relating back to the quote in this paragraph that the feminist movement still has the problem of acting as an oppressor as well. This idea of oppression coming from the females in feminism relates back to Peggy McIntosh's article “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack”. While McIntosh's article relays information mainly focused on race, it can be said for gender as well. She says that those people with white skin 'have been conditioned into oblivion about its existence' and have 'no training in seeing [themselves] as an oppressor....or as a participant in a damaged culture' (pg 83). This relates to the exclusionary female feminists in that they don't see their own privilege and don't consider themselves to act as an oppressor in almost the same way that they are oppressed. How McIntosh talks about privilege, albeit a white privilege and not a gender privilege, explains the power that comes from such privilege, saying that '[power] from unearned privilege can look like strength when it is in fact permission to escape or to dominate' (pg 86). This of course holds true to the female feminists, as they use their privilege to hold themselves above transwomen, having excluded them from the feminist movement for so many years.
Casey Coulter Article Review #1

Casey Coulter
WGST 202
T/TH 12:30-1:45
Professor Currans

Roughton, Ralph. “The Significance of Brokeback Mountian” Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health 18.1 (2014): 83-95
In “The Significance of Brokeback Mountian,” Ralph Roughton explains his reasoning of why he thinks that the movie Brokeback Mountain was a “significant milestone in public attitudes toward homosexuality” (Roughton 85). He introduces the topic by pointing out recent developments in the LGBT movement, goes into a summary of the movie itself, and then analyzes it and gives his own thoughts about why it’s important today. The way the movie is set up evokes empathetic feelings towards the main characters. They are made real and relatable and that’s why Roughton thinks it has made such an impact in our society. 
Roughton explains that the way scenes are placed reflects a certain symbolism in the movie. After describing the two boys’ sexual encounter one night, one wakes up and discovers that a coyote had mangled one of the sheep that he was supposed to be watching (Roughton 89). This scene and others like it highlight the theme in the movie that “link man-to-man sex and sin and violent consequences” (Roughton 89). This metaphor is presented in a way that makes you sympathize with the characters rather than implying that homosexuality is wrong. The whole movie is about coming to terms with sexuality. There’s a theme throughout the movie that shows that that that’s how people are treated when they love someone of the same sex can really open people’s eyes about the issue. 
     In each scene you can see the emotions behind the character’s actions, even though they don’t come right out and say what they’re feeling you still know because the movie puts you in their shoes and forces you to feel with them (Roughton 93). Some of the most powerful moments in the movie have absolutely no words at all. Roughton describes the scene where one of the guys, Ennis, finds his shirt in the room of the other guy, Jack, who had died. Roughton says that, “The message is subtle, but powerful. For the first time, Ennis has met understanding and acceptance for his love of Jack” (Roughton 90). Roughton mentions that Annie Proulx, the woman who wrote the original story in 1997, received many letters from fathers who said “’now I understand the kind of hell my son went through’” (Roughton 93). This helps show that the story can change people’s opinions and be more sensitive and aware of how hard it is for LGBT individuals. She also received many letters from gay men who identified and related to it (Roughton 93). So this shows that her story and the movie it’s based on is not only revealing the struggles of homosexuals, but it is sending a message to actual homosexuals that they are real, what they feel is real, and it helps them embrace who they are. 

     My blog topic for this semester is sexuality in film, so Roughton’s analysis of Brokeback Mountain and how it affects society’s opinion on sexuality really fits in. It helps add to my theory that movies are very influential in our thinking and can give us new insights on thinks we don’t understand and Roughton did a great job of telling us how this movie helped change society’s view of homosexuality. I think this article can relate to the article we read by Abby Ferber, “Keeping Sex in Bounds: Sexuality and the Deconstruction of Race and Gender”. Both Ferber and Roughton mention how society views sexuality, but instead of talking about how movies can affect opinions of it like Roughton did, Ferber talks about how sexuality affects gender and how it can be harmful or hurtful to people. In my opinion this movie is filled with instances that show how society can restrict sexuality in the same ways that Ferber describes in her article, although her article is much more focused on the sexuality aspect. In class last week we discussed landmarks in the LGBT movement and made a timeline. After reading this article I wholeheartedly believe that this movie deserves a place on that timeline.