Ali Marnon
Intro to Gender & Sexuality H
T/Th 12:30-1:45
Blog Topic: Sexual Violence Against
Women
Article Review #3
Fitzgerald, Louise F. "Sexual
Harassment: Violence Against Women in the Workplace." The American Psychologist 48.10 (1993): 1070-076. Print.
In Louise
Fitzgerald’s article “Sexual Harassment: Violence Against Women in the
Workplace” she explore sexual violence in the workplace. In her article she
notes that “Sexual harassment has been a fixture of working life since women
first offered their labor for sale in the marketplace” (Fitzgerald, 1070).
Fitzgerald looks at the nature and prevalence of sexual harassment in the
workplace, what kind of consequences that sexual harassment has on job
performance and the mental states of its victims, and the what legislative
initiatives that can be put into place to help combat sexual violence in the
workplace. Fitzgerald looks at how often and what kind of consequences sexual
violence has and how to put an end to sexual violence in the workplace setting.
Fitzgerald argues that we need to take all of these factors and work to put an
end to the violence that occurs in a workplace.
In her
article, Fitzgerald examines the nature of sexual violence along with its
prevalence in the workplace. The list of types of sexual violence that can be
found occurring in the workplace setting can be just as extensive as any other
setting. However, Fitzgerald notes that “the great majority of harassment in
not physically violent but rather reflects intrusive, unwanted, and coercive
sexual attention” (1071). To illustrate this point, Fitzgerald looked at a
study that was conducted to look at the prevalence of different forms of sexual
violence. In this study, of which Fitzgerald failed to name, they found that sexual
remarks were reported being experienced by 33% of the women participating.
Another 26% reported touching and 15% said that they were pressured to attend
dates with coworkers. Fitzgerald also found that women were more likely to
experience sexual violence in workplaces where “women have traditionally been under-represented”
(1071). She also states that the “government estimates that approximately
12,000 female federal workers were victims of rape or attempted rape by supervisors
or coworkers” (1071). The encounters of sexual harassment did not just occur once.
Fitzgerald finds that some of these experiences can occur for several months at
a time.
The next
thing that Fitzgerald looks at in her article is the consequences that sexual
violence has on job performance and the women’s mental health. One consequence
noted by Fitzgerald is job loss. Of the women being sexually harassed in the
workplace, “25% resigned due to the stresses of the complaint process of the harassment
itself” (1072). Women may be afraid to come forward if they are being sexually
harassed by someone in the workplace since 50% were found to be fired if they
came forward to file a complaint against their harasser. The consequences on
women’s physical and psychological well-being were found to include “anxiety,
depression, headaches, sleep disturbance, gastrointestinal disorders, weight
loss (or gain), nausea, and sexual dysfunction” (1072). This list could
probably be expanded as Fitzgerald also looks at how harassment is associated
with mental disorders such as depression and PTSD. She notes that mental
disorders can be the product of sexual harassment.
Lastly, Fitzgerald looks at legislation that
could be reformed in order to prevent sexual harassment from occurring in the
workplace. She came up with five ways that legislation could be reformed. The
one that Fitzgerald claims to be the most important is having employers make a
policy that they strongly uphold and display prominently so that every employee
will know what the policy is. Fitzgerald’s reasoning is that “weak policies or
those that are laxly enforced are similarly related to higher incidence levels”
(1074). If we are trying to reduce the amount of sexual harassments that occur,
then having a strongly enforced policy would be a good idea. Another
legislature change that Fitzgerald proposes is to increase the amount that can
be paid out to sexual harassment victims. Her third idea is to make sure that
any woman who quit due to sexual harassment be allowed to collect unemployment.
Fitzgerald mentions how “oftentimes, their unemployment is considered to be
“voluntary” and thus not eligible for compensation” (1074). The fourth change
that Fitzgerald would make is to “extend the statute of limitations for filing
sexual harassment charges” (1074). The current length of time to file a charge
currently is about 180-300 days depending on which state you live in. Her last
change would be not to revictimize the victims through the legal system. She says
that “evidence that seeks to make the victim responsible for sexual harassment should
be statutorily excluded in all states” (1074).
This
article relates to my blog topic of sexual violence against women as
Fitzgerald’s article looks at sexual violence against women in the workplace.
Fitzgerald whole point throughout the piece is to look at the effects that
sexual violence can have if it’s committed in the workplace and what we need to
do to stop it from occurring. Fitzgerald’s article is similar to my review of
Zinnstag’s “Sexual Violence against Women in Armed Conflict: Standard Responses
and New Ideas”. They both look at sexual violence and how affects people in
certain situation. They also both believe that we should reform legal system so
that it will no longer be revictimizing the victims. Both of the authors also
acknowledge that women may be ashamed to come forward after the have been
sexually harassed or violated and that we should make it easier for them to
feel comfortable and safe to do so. The articles differ in the areas in which
they examine sexual violence. Fitzgerald explores sexual violence in the
workplace while Zinnstag explores sexual violence in armed conflict situations.
Another difference is that Zinsstag doesn’t particularly look at the types or
how prevalent sexual violence is in armed conflict whereas Fitzgerald looks at
this in the workplace. Zinsstag mostly looks at how to gain justice and get
support for the sexual violence that they endured during armed conflict. The
information included in this article widened my knowledge on how hard the legal
system makes it for victims to get the restitution for the crimes committed
against them. I was not aware that we had a cap on damages that could be paid
to victims of sexual harassment. I was also not aware that there was such a
strict limitation to the amount of time that could pass before you could no
longer file charges. I don’t think that she left anything out that I would have
liked her to address in her article. She did a nice job of including everything
a reader would need to understand her viewpoint and her reasoning.
All of the study's findings seem to reflect actual circumstances. The thing that caught my attention is Fitzgerald's idea that any woman who quits due to sexual harassment should be allowed to collect unemployment. This sort of shocked me. I feel as though all employers would cringe at this. While it does make sense that a woman shouldn't have to go without pay when forced to quit, I feel as though there are many limitations to "handing out" unemployment.
ReplyDeleteI use "handing out" because I feel as though some employers would feel this way. As we know, society is very money driven. And, to be honest, I could easily see and understand why. That's why I really like Fitzgerald's idea that she "claims to be the most important" which is, "having employers make a policy that they strongly uphold and display prominently so that every employee will know what the policy is."
In this case, the employer could easily fire the person that's went against the policy, so that there's no need to "hand out" unemployment in the first place. Which means there's no loss in production/money.
Overall, I don't think that just ANY woman who quits due to sexual harassment should be allowed to collect unemployment. There does exist people who abuse the sexual harassment claim. I do believe, however, that sexual harassment shouldn't happen in the first place. And that, if it does, it shouldn't get so bad that a person is forced to quit. Having a company policy that doesn't tolerate ANY sexual harassment is the route to go.
Which makes it look like the real problem lies with having to show proof of sexual harassment-- Cameras maybe could help? I'm not sure, but I think there should be research looking to develop guidelines for this.
--Josephine Hicks
I find it very disturbing that about 50% of women who come forward to file a complaint about their harassers were fired. This must be because their harassers are their superiors. I could see a boss firing an employee simply to save their own ass. It's awful that it goes on. The fact that women are afraid of coming forward to expose their coworkers sexual harassment is sickening. Her proposed rules and policies are a great way to make a step in the right direction to make sure these things don't happen.
ReplyDeleteAnthony